‘Most people who are concerned about America spend most of their time ranting and raving against particular parties or individuals, leaving the deep-rooted issues unquestioned, unaddressed and thereby unresolved...Those who truly want to make a difference in the world must first make a difference in themselves by disciplining themselves to look past the surface waves and into the deeper movements of the underlying tide.’ YES!! First we must make a difference in ourselves. I love this, I have always felt this way and that is why I have shied away from most political discussions and any personal involvement in politics, because how we know ‘involvement’ today does not resolve issues.
My grandpa was an incredibly patriotic career Air Force Col. and very involved in many community facets. In fact, this tribute was given at his funeral:‘He was a strong man and a mighty man; he was a man of a perfect understanding; yea a man that did not delight in bloodshed; a man whose soul did joy in the liberty and the freedom of his country and his brethren from bondage and slavery; Yea, a man whose heart did swell with thanksgiving to his God for the many privileges and blessings which he bestowed upon his people; a man who did labor exceedingly for the welfare and safety of his people. Yea and he was a man who was firm in the faith of Christ, and had sworn with an oath to defend his people, his rights and his country and his religion even to the loss of his blood.’ (Especially high praise if you are of my faith and recognize the scripture describing Capt. Moroni.) I’ve always wanted to carry on his legacy, but I wasn’t sure how. I wanted to make a difference, but what I saw being done in the political realm was digging deeper holes and I just didn’t see any other way, so just chose not to be involved. Then I learned about natural law and how I can apply it to my life. My answer! Grandpa, I feel like here is where I can carry on your legacy, by living and teaching these laws to my children.
Do you know why the founding generation, a rag-tag band of colonists, were able to defeat the greatest military power in the world at that time? It was because they (rich and poor alike) all understood natural law. ‘In other countries, the people, more simple, and of a less brilliant caste, judge of an ill principle in government only by an actual grievance; here (in the colonies) they anticipate the evil, and judge of the pressure of the grievance by the badness of the principle. They foresee misgovernment at a distance, and snuff the approach of tyranny in every tainted breeze.’ This was true of the general populace, not just a few lawyers, politicians, zealots or whatever, almost everyone had a great education in the classics that exposed them to natural law. ‘Education makes people easy to lead, but difficult to drive, easy to govern, but impossible to enslave.’ ( Lord Brougham)
‘America’s founders ensured their freedoms because they understood them.’ Freedom and responsibility are so inseparable and intertwined. Those who have (or take) the responsibility for freedom are those who will have freedom. The problem is no one in our day is taking that responsibility – only those who have made a career in politics and arguably not even them. How do we take responsibility for our freedom? We get a world class education in the classics and natural law, like our founders did and apply that stuff. I love this: 'There is only one subject and that is TRUTH for application and improvement.' We as a populace have got to learn the truths our forefathers knew once again. As it stands freedom is deteriorating because no one has the education of leadership our founders had, the result of the current education offering is a ‘widespread specialization complemented by arrogance, pride and general ignorance.’ (A Thomas Jefferson Education, 27)
‘Government just keeps growing, and it will continue to grow as long as the prevailing viewpoint of modern government is that there is no higher power than government itself and its purpose is to fix everything possible. Sure most of don’t think of government as God, or do we? Do we think government is the most ‘powerful entity’ in the world? Maybe, maybe that’s why we think it should fix all people’s problems from health care to meal tickets to a whole bunch of foreign wars...and if we act like Washington is the most powerful entity can we really blame Washington for trying to fix lots of things ( and failing, but that’s another story). If we feel like they have the power to, can we blame them for trying? That’s just the thing, government is NOT the most powerful entity in the world or the universe and until we realize that (and act like we realize this) government will just keep growing trying to fix every problem. There are laws, scientific and revealed that are higher than any government, leading to Law 1.
Law 1: The Law of Supremacy. Natural law, not manmade law is supreme. It is the basis for all freedom and success and manmade constitutions and laws must adhere to natural law or freedom will decrease.
I believe God rules in human affairs and by putting so much credo in government are we maybe abdicating our personal responsibility to do our individual part to help and fix things?
The framers of the Constitution made mention of some of these supreme laws in the Declaration of Independence: all men are created equal and endowed with certain inalienable rights (that no government CAN take away.) This was giving a nod to the fact that there is a supreme power over anything those great men did to form a government. They knew this and therefore created a government that honored these natural laws, especially the law of supremacy. ‘If nations or individuals break natural law, there are inevitable natural consequences and manmade laws cannot undo such consequences.’
I can better apply this law in my own life by drawing closer to God and knowing His will is my hiding place.
Law 2: The Law of Authority. In free societies, all government power comes from the people.
We in America give lip service to this, but I wonder if we understand it. Ruling by might is pretty common, but its authority is illegitimate. The framers gave government the power to protect people from a wrong , a wrong is anything a person has no natural right to do to another – murder, wounding, striking, rape, theft, fraud, violence, breaking a contract, among others- protection from these types of wrongs is called a 'right.' If government gets its authority to protect people’s rights from the consent of the people themselves it’s legit. The purpose of government is to maintain equal liberty for all people, and we as a people have given them this authority.
I can better apply this in my own life by standing for equal liberty for every person, in other words, plain and simple I need to always do what I know I should. I need to more willingly and actively work with other people to do what natural morality requires as my duty, listen and follow the promptings of the Holy Ghost.
Law 3: The Law of Limits. Free governments only succeed when they are strong and vigorous, and freedom only lasts if their power is effectively limited.
I’ve mentioned inalienable rights (protection from a wrong) which include equal treatment, and protection of life, liberty, property and a person’s ability to pursue their own happiness. Through the law of authority we’ve given the government authority to protect these rights, but that’s pretty much where gov. intervention should end.
‘Whatever government effort is focused on anything other than protecting inalienable rights will reduce the vigor of government in protecting freedoms.’ Seems pretty common sense, opportunity-cost type stuff, but let’s think in terms of our own government. How many government programs are really about protecting inalienable rights? So if that focus, funding, whatever, is going to something else, the government’s main role of protecting our rights and freedoms is suffering.
How can I better apply this in my own life? I need to study, study, study, get a world-class education in the classics and in freedom (which is essentially the same) so I can understand where the limits for our government SHOULD be. ‘When senators, CEOS, judges and presidents have a different kind and level of education than the regular people, the system is an aristocracy.’ Pretty glaringly apparent in what’s shaping up to be the next presidential race, most of the promising candidates have had fathers or perhaps a spouse hold very high political office.
Law 4: The Law of Delegation. The people may not delegate to government any power they do not possess by natural law.
This one was the biggest ah-ha game changer for me that I had never thought through. It seems common sense, but we are so far from practicing it in today’s society. What one person can morally do is no different than what a large group of people can morally do.
So can I feel bad for my neighbor who’s run on some tough times and give him some help, food, money etc.? Absolutely, it may in fact be my moral duty (I think of my application principle for the Law of Authority) but can I mandate to all my neighbors that Joe is having some bad luck and you HAVE to give him money, food or whatever? Ummm…no! Probably wouldn’t go over really well. So why can our government do this? Bottom line, they shouldn’t. The framers never intended it. If it isn’t right for an individual to do, it can’t be right for a government.
Application to me: Think more deeply about different government issues and agendas in the realm of would it be right for me as an individual to do that?
Law 5: The Law of Force. Humans can only morally use force on other people for self-defense, and government can only morally use force on people for the collective self-defense; any other use of government power is a violation of natural law.
Government is force, plain and simple. Therefore we have to be very careful with what powers we give government. We can NOT control how the government uses the power very easily once it’s been given, so we must think in terms of force whenever we hand over power to government. If bad men in government had this power what could the force upon us? Not saying all men in government are bad, but give good men power that could be used badly and we can’t always guarantee good men will fill those positions.(In my faith I think of King Benjamin and what he did before his death – set up the rule of the judges despite the people loving him as a king and wanted to continue with kings, because not all kings could be counted on to be good. George Washington did much the same thing.) So once again Government power (force) should really be strictly limited to self-defense and collective self-defense for our nation. ‘Every manmade law is based on force and therefore must actually provide for the protection of people’s inalienable rights… When a person steals from another, it is called theft; but when the government steals from another (meaning that it takes or requires anything for any reason other than legitimate self-defense), it is often considered good policy by those who don’t understand natural law.’ ‘When government gets involved in anything beyond stopping criminals and invasions it pretty much always goes too far.’ (Kind of another aspect or level to the Law of Limits)
Application to me: Again, I think I just need to think about government issues and policies and question if they really are for self-defense (collective or individual) and remember all government policy is essentially force.
Law 6: The Law of Decline. When governments break natural law, they bring the decline of freedom and the decline of prosperity on their own nation.
When government is used to do things that an individual could not morally do (breaking the Law of Force and/or Delegation or any other natural law) this kind of law will multiply and infect the whole governmental system. ‘ It will cause the end of the nation’s world leadership, and eventually the end of it’s freedoms and prosperity – unless the trend is reversed.’ Scary and ominous for America, but if enough people know about these laws we CAN and WILL change it.
Application to me: Spread knowledge of these natural laws far and wide so enough folks will know enough to make a difference.
Law 7: The Law of Power. It is the nature of power to try to centralize, and once it is centralized to attempt to expand its control.
I loved the analogy. Picasso aimed to show the ugly that sometimes hides in well designed facades by taking beautiful things, breaking them into pieces, then rearranging them in misshapen ways. (Reminds of Isaiah 5:20: Wo unto them who shall good evil and evil good, shall call light darkness and darkness light.) Government has a long history of using such facades to hide what it is really doing.
‘People who wield power influence all of us, whether the power is used openly or in concealed ways. As a result, understanding power is vital to maintaining freedom.’ Are we as a people seeing the facade or the truth of hidden designs and actions? Picasso-like thinking: are we seeing past the misshapen design to what it really represents?
Today there can be no doubt that government power is centralizing (and has been for some time) and that it is drastically expanding. How ‘controlled’ do we really want to be?
Application to me: I can’t really think of anything right off, other than being aware of this in our government and my own natural man tendencies in my family. Do I seek to expand my control beyond what really is my duty as a mother, simply because, let’s be honest, I am a pretty central control point. I had a really interesting insight today. Flint was trying to force Liza to play school with him, she didn’t want to. I told him he couldn’t force her to do anything they didn’t want to. He replied, ‘But mom you force me to do things!’ Ouch! Then I thought natural law – yes sometimes I do force things ( much more than I should and I am now more cognizant of this and trying to do better) but my husband and I are the authority for our family (that authority came from God) and I can enforce protection of people’s rights and property… like when you hit your sibling I can use force to prevent or reconcile the issue by restraining the striking hand or exacting the extra chore consequence. Or when you are destroying property by throwing a giant tizzy fit I can use force to put an end to that and still be within natural law. Beyond protecting rights, I should NOT be using force. Interesting train of thought anyway.
Law 8: The Law of the Gaps. Freedom is found in the gaps, where governments compete for power.
Here the multiple branches of government were talked about and how important it is to have multiple branches competing against each other, because in that very competition freedom is preserved. Under this system with 10 (yes, 10, who knew?) branches of government working to keep each other in check by 1945 with just 6% of the world’s population the U.S. was creating more than half of the world’s goods and services (WOW!) – not by government planning, but mostly through voluntary free enterprise. The law of power was harnessed to allow the law of gaps to work.
The 10 branches were listed as:
1.Executive – the presidency, meant to represent the nation, mainly in preserving national security.
2. Spending Branch – The House, see natl. needs and implement solutions
3. Aristocratic Branch – The Senate, meant to keep most of the ambitious leaders in one place where they could be closely watched (very interesting I thought!) and they’d also naturally check the spending branch.
4. Judicial- Supreme Court, represents the constitution and keeps other branches from exceeding their written powers. Is that really what they are doing today?
5. The governing branches -- States. Interesting word choice – GOVERNING.
6. Participative branch – local governments, meant to keep people involved and participating in maintaining their freedoms.
7. The checking branch—juries, able to check government if it unjustly attacked the regular people. (unlawful arrests, use of excessive force, etc.)
8. Backup checking branch -- Grand juries.
9. The Federalizing Branch -- Electoral College, meant to keep all the power for deciding executive functions from being had by most populace states.
10. The overseer branch – voters, who would closely watch the entire system and keep it in line through regular elections and ongoing participation between elections.
These 10 branches of government were meant to cooperate as needed to thwart any great national security threat, but continually compete with each other on every other issue. Freedom really is found in the gaps, that’s why the framers designed so many branches, so there could be more gaps between them. As Washington centralizes and gains more power over our lives, there are fewer and fewer gaps (aka areas of opportunity). Unless this is reversed American freedom is in serious jeopardy.
Application to me: be more involved in ongoing participation between elections and work on building more sense of community with my neighbors.
Law 9: The Law of the Vital Few. Through history, real freedom depends on the leadership of a few ordinary people who do extraordinary things.
Honestly, when these laws were lined out they seem like total common sense, but I’ve gotten so caught up in the political brouhaha that is the news that I forgot to apply this common sense. This is the hope, it only takes a few of us, in the gaps, who exert leadership to preserve freedom. ‘As badly as America has gone off track, the Constitution still gives the people the FINAL say… We may rise up and use our power, simply ignore it, or we may follow the lead of the elite media.’ Interesting choice, huh?
‘Citizens stand up for freedom when they think independently, refusing to be swayed by the agendas or propaganda of media organizations or political parties. If the middle class voted in unison against elite schemes and proposals we could fix Washington quickly.' The two-party system that is so pushed by our media and the elites, is the reason we don’t do this. They’ve managed to divide the big voting block so as middle-class we essentially nullify our own power… leaving it to the elites… more pause for thought.
Here’s the solutions the author gives: 1st – take a stand for freedom and think independently. 2nd – carefully consider who you vote into the House. As the spending branch they have the most ability to slow the growth of the biggest centralizing power – the national executive. We need to elect those who will truly change things. Watch the House and get involved in watching and influencing their choices. We all still have this ability. 3rd – Spread entrepreneurship (this was hard for me to grasp at first, but I think I got it). Successful entrepreneurship engages people in important undertakings that directly benefit society. Build community. Take action to improve society without waiting for government. Inspire people to live up to their potential instead of settling for making a living which is the mediocrity that is the norm in declining nations.
‘The future of freedom depends on the few- the entrepreneurial few – who take the risk of aiming for greatness and refusing to settle for societal norms of mediocrity.’ Go out and do extraordinary things without waiting for the direction or permission of officials or governments. This ties back into law of supremacy a bit, government feels they have the power and should fix things, maybe because no one else is trying too (maybe because of gov. regulations, but maybe not). Leadership rises most often from average citizens, in contrast to elites who often impede real progress.
Application to me: Be more informed and involved in the House and know that I can make a difference if I try to fulfill my purpose in life.
Law 10: The Law of Liberty. When freedom is reduced for some, it is reduced for all.
Once again I am reminded that those who take responsibility for freedom will have it, those that don’t will lose it. I loved this: ‘ freedom is truly indivisible because taking it from some ultimately reduces the freedom of everyone.’ I also loved this: (credited to Pastor Neimoller regarding Nazi German)
First they came for the communists, And I didn’t speak out because I wasn’t a communist.
Then they came for the socialists, and I didn’t speak out because I wasn’t a socialist.
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I didn’t speak out because I wasn’t a trade unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I didn’t speak out because I wasn’t a Jew.
Then they came for me, and there was no one left to speak for me.
This is what happens when we willingly stand by and allow others to lose their freedoms because it is not affecting us. ‘Those who truly stand for freedom will stand up for the inalienable rights of all human beings from all walks of life because they realize that when others are free, their own freedom is safer, and when others lose their freedoms, their own freedom is always in jeopardy.’ Plus.. it’s just the right thing to do.
Who are we blatantly taking freedom from with our laws today? Unborn children, as abortion is legal, immigrants with anti-immigration laws, among others. Those were just the first to come to my mind. (Regarding immigration: If people are coming for freedom rather than freebies, which if we weren’t breaking other natural laws by handling welfare as we do, they should absolutely be free to come.)
Application to me: Right from the book, look around, find a group that is being denied rights and opportunities, and help take a stand for freedom, even if you aren’t part of this group. Personally for me an superb equal education for all is my passion and this right is being denied so many underprivileged (and not so underprivileged) and I will do my part to at least let them know that there is a way to still get a superb education wherever you are and whatever your background or resources are.
Law 11: The Law of Economy. All powers delegated to government must be entrusted to the lowest level of government that can effectively accomplish the desired goal.
I wrote a whole blog post on how Common Core is not the real issue behind or the solution to the problems in education today, based on the Law of Economy.
Basically, the Fed. Should be entrusted with the defense of the nation and it’s foreign and federal relations (and possibly help resolve disputes between the states); state governments should be entrusted with civil rights, law , police, administration and other state specific state concerns (like public lands management); the counties with their own concerns and the townships with their own concerns. Think Little House on the Prairie or Anne of Green Gables Town Hall meetings. This hales back to the Law of Power and Law of the Gaps, but if we are following the Law of Economy power is kept from centralizing and more gaps meaning more freedom is had.
‘The very definition of freedom is having the liberty to do the things you want and choose within the realm of your areas of stewardship.’ My above noted blog post delves into this.
If we just could apply this principle SO much money and time would be saved and things would be done a heap better, but we don’t because we are too busy to get involved in local government. ‘Most people don’t mean to lose freedom, but they don’t focus significant time or energy on keeping it.’
Application to me: Be more involved in local government.
Law 12: The Law of Progress. The actual level of freedom and prosperity in any society is directly equivalent to the level of free enterprise.
This is so obvious to me as one of my pet hobbies is economics. Government regulation often stands in the way of free enterprise. The more regulation, the less freedom there is to take action toward goals. Granted some things need regulation (things that affect rights, like medical malpractice etc.) but the more government regulation you have, the less opportunity average people have of working toward their goals and making progress – this is why we have a shrinking middle class today.
I loved this example: A man has one hand stuck in a fire and the other stuck in ice. Free enterprise allows the man to immediately and freely pull his hands out and warm or cool them to the degree needed. If government is dealing with the situation (because they are not following the Law of Economy) he has to go through the whole lobby, campaign process to try and get anything done and it takes way too long. His hands are burned off and frostbitten. Also the government likes to deal in statistics, so by taking the average of the temperatures, to government it would seem like everything is OK, so no change is needed, unfortunately for the poor individual.
People can decide best for themselves in their areas of stewardship (because they know themselves and those areas better than anyone else) and the less government regulates their affairs the better the decisions are and the more progress is made. This is free enterprise and for free enterprise to work the government protects inalienable rights, treats everyone equally and does nothing else.
Application to me: Be more supportive of entrepreneurial pursuits.
These are the 12 natural laws addressed in We Hold These Truths to Be Self Evident by Oliver DeMille. They really have revolutionized my understanding of government. They seem common sense, but also so ground-breaking. These were commonly understood and applied by the founding generation – these laws were the common language all framers of the Constitution and the signers of the Declaration understood and discussed in. If we want the level of freedom those great men envisioned for us we need to understand and apply these laws.
‘The future of freedom and prosperity depends on millions of us understanding natural law and the proper role of government… If we start repealing or changing one or a few such laws (that violate natural law), people will feel more freedom and want to keep going in the right direction. God’s natural laws really are that powerful.’ Not only that, these natural laws are also the laws of success for family life, business endeavors, anything. Pretty powerful.
All qoutes (unless otherwise noted) are from We Hold These Truths to be Self Evident by Oliver DeMille.
No comments:
Post a Comment